ARTICLE | 5 MINS READ

Stockholm Syndrome: What It Is, Why It Happens, And What Recovery Looks Like

Published on

24th Jul 2026

Stockholm Syndrome

The phrase stockholm syndrome was coined after a 1973 bank robbery in Stockholm, Sweden. During a six-day hostage situation, several captives developed emotional bonds with their captors and later defended them publicly. Criminologist and psychiatrist Nils Bejerot, who consulted with police during the incident, used the phrase to describe the phenomenon. Psychologist Frank Ochberg later formalised the concept in collaboration with the FBI, defining it as a coping response in which captives develop positive feelings toward those who hold power over them.

The term has since expanded well beyond hostage situations. Today, stockholm syndrome is recognised as a psychological response that can occur in any relationship defined by power imbalance, threat, and intermittent kindness, including intimate partnerships, families, cults, and workplace environments.

The Psychology Behind the Response

Stockholm syndrome is not a personality flaw or a sign of weakness. It is, at its core, a survival mechanism.

When a person is placed in a threatening situation with no clear means of escape, the brain prioritises survival above most other functions. One way it does this is by finding reasons to trust the person holding power. If the captor or abuser shows any gesture of kindness, even something as small as providing food or refraining from violence for a day, the brain registers this as meaningful. Over time, the perceived threat from that person diminishes, while attachment grows.

Research in trauma and attachment theory suggests that fear and bonding share overlapping neurological pathways. The same system that activates during early attachment with caregivers can be hijacked in situations of prolonged threat. This is part of why Stockholm syndrome so frequently emerges in childhood, where dependency on a caregiver is total, and the option of leaving does not exist.

Avatar

Get 15% OFF on First 3 Sessions - Use Code: FIRST15

Therapy works best when it’s approached with consistency. Take those first few steps with confidence, so you can begin your mental health journey. **Limited Period Offer

Stockholm Syndrome and Trauma Bonding

These two terms are often used interchangeably, but they describe related rather than identical experiences.

Stockholm syndrome specifically refers to positive feelings a person develops toward someone who threatens or controls them, often accompanied by a belief that the controller is actually their protector. Trauma bonding is a broader concept that describes the emotional attachment formed through repeated cycles of abuse and reconciliation. It does not require the person to identify with their abuser or defend them publicly.

In practice, trauma bonding often underlies Stockholm syndrome. The cycles of tension, harm, and reconciliation that characterise abusive relationships create powerful emotional ties, particularly when the abuser periodically meets the person's emotional or physical needs. Over time, the person begins to associate the abuser with both the source of pain and its relief.

Why Loyalty to an Abuser Develops

Understanding why someone might defend or feel affection for a person who has hurt them requires stepping outside of how the situation looks from the outside.

In Stockholm syndrome, several psychological processes are typically at work simultaneously. Threat perception narrows attention to immediate survival. Any reduction in that threat, however small, is experienced as relief and attributed to the person holding power. Isolation from other support systems intensifies dependency on the abuser. And when a person has been told repeatedly, directly or indirectly, that they are the source of the problem, it becomes easier to believe the abuser's perspective than to hold onto their own.

In Indian relational contexts, these dynamics are often reinforced by cultural expectations around loyalty, endurance, and not speaking ill of family. Stockholm syndrome within families, including situations of childhood emotional abuse, coercive marriages, or controlling parental relationships, can go unnamed for years because the behaviour is framed as love or discipline.

Recognising the Signs

Stockholm syndrome does not always present dramatically. Some of the more common indicators include:

Feeling responsible for the abuser's emotional state or behaviour. Defending the person to others, even when that person has caused harm. Finding it difficult to leave or to imagine life without them. Minimising or rationalising incidents of harm. Feeling more anxious and lost after leaving than during the relationship. Experiencing guilt at the idea of pursuing help or speaking honestly about what happened.

These responses are not signs of irrationality. They are patterns that form in response to specific conditions, and they shift with the right kind of support.

Avatar

Is how you see yourself holding you back?

Take the assessment to explore patterns in self-worth, self-perception, and confidence.

How Stockholm Syndrome Affects Daily Life

The impact of Stockholm syndrome extends beyond the relationship in which it formed. People who have lived through this experience often carry its effects into other areas of their lives.

In subsequent relationships, there may be a tendency to tolerate controlling behaviour because it feels familiar, or to interpret affection from partners who do not exert control as somehow unreliable. At work, a person may habitually defer to authority even when it causes them harm, or find it difficult to set limits with managers or colleagues. Emotionally, the experience of having one's perceptions consistently overridden can leave lasting uncertainty about one's own judgment.

Research consistently links childhood experiences of coercive control with higher rates of anxiety, depression, and difficulties with emotional regulation in adulthood. Stockholm syndrome, when it forms early, can shape the template through which all future relationships are interpreted.

How Therapists Approach This

Stockholm syndrome is not listed as a standalone diagnosis in the DSM-5, though the experiences it describes are well-recognised clinically. It is often assessed in the context of trauma, complex PTSD, or patterns consistent with abusive relationship dynamics.

A therapist working with someone who has experienced Stockholm syndrome will typically focus on several things: helping the person develop enough safety to begin examining the relationship clearly, validating the logic of their coping responses without reinforcing harm, addressing dissociation or emotional numbing that may have developed as a protective function, and gradually rebuilding the person's capacity to trust their own perceptions.

Therapeutic approaches that have evidence behind them in trauma contexts include trauma-focused cognitive behavioural therapy (TF-CBT), EMDR (Eye Movement Desensitisation and Reprocessing), and attachment-based therapies that address the relational dimensions of the experience.

Recovery from Stockholm syndrome is not about arriving at a particular emotional conclusion, such as hating the person who caused harm. It is about regaining access to one's own perspective, being able to feel a range of responses, and being able to make choices that are not driven solely by the old survival logic.

Rebuilding Emotional Safety

After leaving a situation where Stockholm syndrome developed, rebuilding is rarely a straightforward process.

The disorientation of no longer having the abuser's framework to organise around can feel destabilising, sometimes more so than the relationship itself. This is a recognised part of recovery, not a sign that leaving was the wrong choice.

What tends to support recovery over time is consistent, boundaried therapeutic support rather than crisis-only intervention. Rebuilding connections with people outside the previous relationship. Practising noticing what one actually feels, which may require some relearning after years of overriding or dismissing internal signals. And patience with the pace of the process.

Stockholm syndrome develops over time, in response to sustained conditions. It does not resolve in a single conversation or after a moment of clarity. What it does respond to is sustained, careful attention to the experience, and support from people who understand its complexity without pathologising the person who lived through it.

If any of what is described here feels familiar, speaking with a qualified therapist who has experience in trauma and relational dynamics is a reasonable place to start.

Avatar

Need help deciding your next step?

Talk to a trained clinical coach to understand what you’re experiencing and explore suitable mental health care support options.